After ripping my hair out when Parallels once again ground my system to a halt trying to boot Windows (XP, no less), I finally decided to try VMWare Fusion.
I’m glad I did. At no point during the bootup process or while Vista is running do I feel any performance impacts in Mac OS X that really annoy me. Plus, it just looks more polished and professional than Parallels.



Interesting…
I may take a look when we’re swapping video cards. I’m happy with Parallels, but I agree, VMWare is a LOT more configurable (at least the versions I’ve worked with).
-=Russ=-
(1) What was parallels doing?
(2) A unified toolbar makes VMWare more “polished” ? I don’t care that much, but doesn’t the fact that you have vastly more horizontal pixels than vertical pixels make the Parallels UI more polished?
From a technical point of view there’s barely any difference between the two. Parallels hypervisor is slightly less resource intensive while VMWare can address both cores on Dual core machines. That’s about it
I just use Windows XP on Parallels for homework and so far I’ve had zero issues with it on Tiger and Leopard with both stable and beta builds, as it’s pretty much taken everything I’ve thrown at it well.
Im not pro something and anti anything else (I just got Parallels because they were actually selling their product when school began and VMWare I don’t think even had their beta out or they weren’t selling it yet) but your post makes no sense to me at all